Minnesota Record
Saint Paul
Zoning

Sign ordinance reform

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 1, 2026.

Public comments (5)

SupportiveJoe SpencerApr 1, 2026

The Downtown Alliance president argued that restrictive signage rules make downtown look dead, deter visitors and investment, and that peer cities that liberalized their codes saw real growth.

Policy Committee — April 1, 2026 · 1:04:40 →
SupportiveJohn PerlitzApr 1, 2026

The Chamber's government affairs VP described members facing dozens of separate permit applications for window decals, unpredictable approvals, and businesses concluding signage simply isn't worth it in Saint Paul.

Policy Committee — April 1, 2026 · 1:08:53 →
SupportiveLynn PingleApr 1, 2026

The Business Review Council chair and MACI Company CEO presented findings from the city's cultural destination area study showing signage and wayfinding barriers across all corridors, not just downtown.

Policy Committee — April 1, 2026 · 1:12:26 →
SupportiveAngie BeaulieuApr 1, 2026

The DSI director detailed the code's scale — 40 pages, 17 sign districts, 250 permits a year — and suggested plain-language simplification and allowing common signs by right.

Policy Committee — April 1, 2026 · 1:24:02 →
SupportiveTony JohnsonApr 1, 2026

The PED zoning staff laid out the fix: a comprehensive zoning study consolidating the 17 districts, simplifying standards, and allowing more signs by right — with a resolution next month and changes by fall.

Policy Committee — April 1, 2026 · 1:33:40 →