Masked law enforcement ordinance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Masked law enforcement operations ordinance→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 11, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Ward 5 resident who wears an N95 for health reasons supports the ordinance and quipped ICE officers worried about health should quit.
City Council — February 11, 2026 · 1:43:08 →Ward 1 resident demanded the SWAT exemption be closed, recounting a 2025 pre-dawn SPPD SWAT raid on her neighbors.
City Council — February 11, 2026 · 1:43:45 →Immunocompromised Ward 1 neighbor argued masking by ICE is about intimidation, not doxxing fears.
City Council — February 11, 2026 · 1:45:55 →Ward 1 resident said the city should be willing to face lawsuits to protect children and demanded enforcement, not words.
City Council — February 11, 2026 · 1:48:22 →A St. Cloud visitor opposed the ordinance and hurled racist and transphobic attacks at council members, prompting condemnation from the council.
City Council — February 11, 2026 · 1:50:32 →Said agents hide their faces because they know they're violating rights, citing ICE detention statistics.
City Council — February 11, 2026 · 2:26:40 →