Southbridge Crossings East PUD Amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Southbridge Crossings East commercial development→At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 9, 2026.
Public comments (2)
The longtime property owner described years of effort on the parcel, said a car wash and other tenants have genuine interest, and asked for relief from the tree ordinance's roughly $200,000 penalty, arguing it's an improper impact fee on commercial sites that can't physically fit replacement trees.
Planning Commission - Jul 9, 2026 · 5:02 →The project's civil engineer explained the site has about 200 trees, only 176 two-and-a-half-inch replacements can fit, and the caliper-inch shortfall triggers a nearly $200,000 penalty even though the landscape plan meets code.
Planning Commission - Jul 9, 2026 · 12:01 →