Minnesota Record
Richfield
Public Safety

Flock cameras

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (10)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
12
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.

Public comments (14)

OpposedEric SchneiderSep 22, 2026

Argued the Flock camera system's benefits are anecdotal, criticized data sharing with hundreds of other cities' networks, questioned oversight, and noted 16 other Minnesota municipalities have ended their contracts; urged the council to scrutinize the system.

City Council - Sep 22, 2026 · 15:39 →
SupportiveMike CarlsonAug 25, 2026

In a follow-up email read into the record, a 36-year resident supported keeping the cameras, saying the city had chances for public input, the 2023 breach appears resolved, and the tool keeps the community safe.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedSteve McKeownAug 25, 2026

Opposed the cameras; also said he supports the proposed Legion development but wants it scaled down due to Portland Avenue traffic impacts.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedTammy KronarekAug 25, 2026

Questioned the volume of images collected, data retention and access, whether the cameras improve safety, and enforcement of vehicles without plates.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedJody JohnsonAug 25, 2026

Raised privacy, accuracy, data-sharing, and misuse concerns, including impacts on domestic violence survivors, reproductive healthcare access, and immigration enforcement.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedAngie ReigerAug 25, 2026

Spoke for petition signers asking the city to pause and end the Flock contract, and requested a written response and a public forum on future surveillance proposals.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedLinda PetersenAug 25, 2026

Cited privacy and surveillance concerns and asked the city to cancel its contract and explain other safety measures.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedJessica LyonsAug 25, 2026

Raised privacy, data use, and cost concerns, and asked whether city resources could instead support residents' food and housing needs.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedSica DawnAug 25, 2026

A Minneapolis resident and chamber member who asked for transparency on Flock data use and consideration of canceling the contracts.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedMathew BergAug 25, 2026

Questioned camera placement, lack of community input, and potential overreach; urged the council to discontinue the cameras.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedAaron McKainAug 25, 2026

Raised legal, privacy, and national security concerns, submitted a memorandum on liability risk, and encouraged seeking local expert input.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedNikhil NaidvAug 25, 2026

Cited data security and privacy issues, referenced reported security vulnerabilities, and asked the city to consider canceling the contract.

City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 0:00 →
SupportiveLandon McKayJan 27, 2026

Backed city efforts to limit ICE cooperation including reconsidering Flock cameras, and called for more rent and food assistance given limited local resources.

City Council - Jan 27, 2026 · 0:00 →
ConcernedLandon McKayJan 13, 2026

Said thoughts and prayers aren't enough and urged removal of Flock cameras he says aid ICE tracking despite city assurances.

City Council - Jan 13, 2026 · 37:18 →