LexisNexus contract
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 12, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Urged tabling the amendment until a binding clause bars immigration-related use of Accurint data.
City Council — January 12, 2026 · 14:03 →Daughter of an immigrant who asked the council to end the LexisNexus contract and stand against ICE tactics.
City Council — January 12, 2026 · 16:36 →Recounted his great-uncle's Nazi-era murder and urged the council to cut ties with LexisNexus and not be complicit.
City Council — January 12, 2026 · 22:57 →Questioned lack of public notice on LexisNexus use and disputed the HSI-is-not-ICE distinction.
City Council — January 12, 2026 · 32:51 →Urged ending the LexisNexus contract, citing ICE surveillance contracts.
City Council — January 12, 2026 · 42:31 →Emotionally urged tabling the surveillance contract, echoing earlier speakers.
City Council — January 12, 2026 · 58:41 →Boy Scout and Youth in Government member urging termination of the LexisNexus contract.
City Council — January 12, 2026 · 1:06:21 →IT security admin who said Accurint practices don't meet the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and recommended discontinuation.
City Council — January 12, 2026 · 1:10:11 →