Montean Meadows
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 10
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 15, 2026.
Public comments (14)
Questioned whether the council sees all the planning commission detail; worried about paving only half of 131st Avenue, dust returning in six weeks, and added traffic.
City Council - Jun 15, 2026 · 54:13 →Said area wells have dropped about 10 feet and DNR reports 50+ dry wells regionally; asked the council to pause the development and demanded engineering explain how wells wouldn't be affected.
City Council - Jun 15, 2026 · 13:31 →Described a near-miss with a speeding driver on the gravel stretch of 131st Avenue and worried speeds will worsen with 86 new homes; also cited the lack of nearby elementary schools.
City Council - Jun 15, 2026 · 24:50 →Argued the road infrastructure plan is wrong — estimated 300 daily trips in and out — and fears a child could be killed on 131st Avenue or Legacy Creek.
City Council - Jun 15, 2026 · 26:00 →Supported the developer paying to pave the whole road and asked the city to consider dropping water tables affecting wells.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 38:01 →Questioned why neighbors only heard about the project now, objected to partial paving and dust, and wants no forced connection to city water and sewer.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 41:11 →Confused by the financing, argued it's unfair to push infrastructure costs onto adjacent homeowners.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 46:11 →Read a prepared statement opposing the project, calling the funding model predatory and asking the city to make the developer pay all infrastructure costs and pave the full road.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 28:30 →Her small parcel faces the new street where pavement would end; she objects to partial paving, dust, and any potential reimbursement obligation.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 51:31 →Urged commissioners to drive the dirt road, worried about speeds on the straight mile, and fears schools can't keep up with Blaine's growth.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 56:02 →The lone supporter — he's waited since 1994 for the area to develop and says a local developer paving half the road benefits all of Blaine.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 48:31 →Ham Lake resident asked that the development not connect to Shenandoah Road and suggested a fence or landscape buffer along the north property line.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 33:03 →Said the project fails CUP criteria on traffic safety and infrastructure, asking for amendments or a return to a council workshop.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 35:39 →Lives directly north and wants assurance his mature oak trees won't be damaged during construction.
Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 37:00 →