Minnesota Record
Blaine
Schools

Montean Meadows

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (6)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
10
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 15, 2026.

Public comments (14)

OpposedRichard PaulstromJun 15, 2026

Questioned whether the council sees all the planning commission detail; worried about paving only half of 131st Avenue, dust returning in six weeks, and added traffic.

City Council - Jun 15, 2026 · 54:13 →
OpposedDave WerraJun 15, 2026

Said area wells have dropped about 10 feet and DNR reports 50+ dry wells regionally; asked the council to pause the development and demanded engineering explain how wells wouldn't be affected.

City Council - Jun 15, 2026 · 13:31 →
OpposedLiz GrazulisJun 15, 2026

Described a near-miss with a speeding driver on the gravel stretch of 131st Avenue and worried speeds will worsen with 86 new homes; also cited the lack of nearby elementary schools.

City Council - Jun 15, 2026 · 24:50 →
OpposedChris GrazulisJun 15, 2026

Argued the road infrastructure plan is wrong — estimated 300 daily trips in and out — and fears a child could be killed on 131st Avenue or Legacy Creek.

City Council - Jun 15, 2026 · 26:00 →
MixedDan WerraMay 12, 2026

Supported the developer paying to pave the whole road and asked the city to consider dropping water tables affecting wells.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 38:01 →
OpposedRichard FallstromMay 12, 2026

Questioned why neighbors only heard about the project now, objected to partial paving and dust, and wants no forced connection to city water and sewer.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 41:11 →
OpposedChris GrazulisMay 12, 2026

Confused by the financing, argued it's unfair to push infrastructure costs onto adjacent homeowners.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 46:11 →
OpposedDave MathewsMay 12, 2026

Read a prepared statement opposing the project, calling the funding model predatory and asking the city to make the developer pay all infrastructure costs and pave the full road.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 28:30 →
OpposedChar OestreichMay 12, 2026

Her small parcel faces the new street where pavement would end; she objects to partial paving, dust, and any potential reimbursement obligation.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 51:31 →
OpposedLiz GrazulisMay 12, 2026

Urged commissioners to drive the dirt road, worried about speeds on the straight mile, and fears schools can't keep up with Blaine's growth.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 56:02 →
SupportiveMike BayerMay 12, 2026

The lone supporter — he's waited since 1994 for the area to develop and says a local developer paving half the road benefits all of Blaine.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 48:31 →
ConcernedBlaine KrugerudMay 12, 2026

Ham Lake resident asked that the development not connect to Shenandoah Road and suggested a fence or landscape buffer along the north property line.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 33:03 →
OpposedJon GorzyckiMay 12, 2026

Said the project fails CUP criteria on traffic safety and infrastructure, asking for amendments or a return to a council workshop.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 35:39 →
ConcernedJeff FreyMay 12, 2026

Lives directly north and wants assurance his mature oak trees won't be damaged during construction.

Planning Commission - May 12, 2026 · 37:00 →